Friday, November 27, 2020

'Amy Covid Barrett' Trends as Left Goes 'Definitely Crazy' Over 5-4 SCOTUS Ruling on Religious Gatherings

featured image

” Practically” as pleasurable as the Supreme Court’s 5-4 choice to obstruct New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s order restricting the size of spiritual events– seemingly to fight versus the spread of COVID– has been enjoying the predictable apoplectic meltdown on the Left.

Additionally, the pleasure is made additional unique by knowing that they know SCOTUS may well not have even used up the case– simply as it declined to do in 2 similar cases earlier this year– if Amy Coney Barrett were not on the Court to cast the tie-breaker.

And best of all is understanding that the Democrat Party and its dancing monkeys in the liberal media know damn well Wednesday’s SCOTUS decision was a harbinger of things to come.

That understanding is twofold.

Initially, Barrett’s confirmation strengthened a conservative bulk on the Court, made even more vital on Wednesday when Chief Justice John Roberts when again revealed his real colors by sidling up along with the three liberal justices and casting with his lot with them.

2nd, the understanding that regardless of the outcome of the 2020 governmental election, Donald Trump’s legacy is not only secured; it was manifested on Wednesday night.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York implicated the U.S. Supreme Court of political partisanship after it rejected his coronavirus constraints on spiritual services. He recommended the 5-to-4 decision was a reflection of the court’s new conservative bulk. https://t.co/CwuJfvuEsu

— The New York Times (@nytimes) November 26, 2020

Let the hyperbolic histrionics begin!

Within minutes of news of the SCOTUS ruling breaking, Leftists cranked up their regular level of hysteria to full-blast crazy-train, as “Amy Covid Barrett” began to trend on social media. As reported by our pals at Twitchy, smug blue-checkmark Twitter users led the clown car parade out of the gate.

Vocalist Deren Ney was simply one lots of to play the “Amy Covid Barrett” card, no doubt believing it was creative– and devastating, too.

Impeach Amy Covid Barrett

— Deren Ney (@DerenNey) November 26, 2020

Screenwriter Randi Mayem Singer promised to call ACB “Amy Covid Barrett” for the rest of her( unpleasant) life; as if the Hollywood lefty wouldn’t come up with an even “better” label for Barrett, sooner or later.

I guarantee I will call her Amy Covid Barrett for the rest of her unqualified zealot hack judge life.

— Randi Mayem Vocalist (@rmayemsinger) November 26, 2020

Author Ali A. Rizvi opted for a ridiculous “death” tweet. (Ignore Laurence People’s drivel; he was lying and he understood it.)

Amy Covid Barrett literally killing it at SCOTUS https://t.co/6EDgf3frOZ pic.twitter.com/kNmUZtxGNJ

— Ali A. Rizvi (@aliamjadrizvi) November 26, 2020

This lunatic “developer of animation” didn’t know whether to laugh about the ridiculous label or weep about the “thousands and thousands” of more sure deaths that ACB “simply handed us.”

I want to laugh that Amy Covid Barrett is trending however can’t stop thinking about the thousands and thousands more deaths she simply handed us.

— Q. Allan Brocka (@allanbrocka) November 26, 2020

ARTIST AND WRITER TONY POSNANSKI WAS OBVIOUSLY SO UPSET THAT HE DECIDED TO GO ALL-CAPS JUST TO ENSURE EVERYBODY KNEW IT.

PLEASED THANKSGIVING TO EVERYBODY OTHER THAN THE GOP, SUPER SPREADERS, AND JUDGE AMY COVID BARRETT.

— Tony Posnanski (@tonyposnanski) November 26, 2020

Elsewhere, One Of The Most Trusted Name in News ™ trotted out a doctor to slam the judgment as an “absolutely insane” choice that “decreases the value of human lives.” Dr. Peter Hotez stated, after being cued up by CNN fill-in host Boris Sanchez:

” Yeah, it’s absolutely crazy.

” Which Supreme Court judgment did simply that– it cheapens human lives and makes it truly hard for our health care providers to provide the best care possible to lower mortality rates.”

Sanchez “forgot” to ask Hotez if he although thought months of “peaceful demonstrations” cheapened human lives. Or perhaps Sanchez just believed those lives were “cheap.” [sarc]

While we’re at it, I question if the excellent physician thinks abortion– or as Biden calls it, “ an important health care service“– “decreases the value of human life.”

Previous Obama stooge Ben Rhodes– Rhodes is still a stooge; he simply does not work for Chicago Jesus Barrack Obama, any longer– broken out the I-word– “illegitimate”– the Left’s favorite word over the last 4 years.

The brand-new invalid 5-4 SCOTUS majority reversing a policy to put more lives in threat. https://t.co/i8zzrqB6Vr

— Ben Rhodes (@brhodes) November 26, 2020

Makes best “sense,”? Illegitimate president begets illegitimate Supreme Court Justice begets illegitimate Supreme Court decision.

Even the “victim” of the SCOTUS ruling himself lashed out at the Court’s choice; however, noted “Management” professional Andrew Cuomo always blasts those who right his wrongs.

” We understand who he designated to the Court and we understand their ideology,” Cuomo said calling the choice “unimportant” and “moot.”

” The Supreme Court made a ruling. It’s more illustrative of the Supreme Court than anything else.

” It’s irrelevant of any practical impact since of the zone they were discussing is moot. It ended last week,” the governor stated, adding, “It does not have any useful impact.

” The suit had to do with the Brooklyn zone. The Brooklyn zone no longer exists as a red zone. That’s mooted. That restriction is no longer in result. That circumstance simply does not exist because those limitations are gone.”

” Practical effect” aside, Cuomo was lying. Depending on the sense that he knows complete well that the SCOTUS judgment establishes precedent, which the next time he gets a wild hair up his considers going all Andrew Cuomo with a comparable order he might first hesitate.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo responds to Supreme Court blocking restrictions on holy places: “We know who he appointed to the court, we understand their ideology.” pic.twitter.com/XJhp96 LBfK

— The Hill (@thehill) November 27, 2020

The bottom line:

Initially, victory for the First Modification and spiritual liberty in the U.S. Supreme Court. The satisfying knowledge that the Left not just lost its cumulative crap over this decision; but that it also knows full well that the decision was a harbinger of things to come– made possible by a solidified conservative bulk on Court.

And best of all, Donald Trump “did that.” (That was for you, Chicago Jesus Barack Obama.)

And the Democrats can’t do a damn feature of it.

Read More

http://allcnaprograms.com/amy-covid-barrett-trends-as-left-goes-definitely-crazy-over-5-4-scotus-ruling-on-religious-gatherings/

No comments:

Post a Comment