The COVID-19 pandemic has actually made clear that government licensing of health specialists blocks access to care.
Licensing offers state politicians the last word on allowable categories of clinicians, the education and training requirements for each category, and the range of services each classification of clinician might perform. It lowers access to health services by increasing prices and minimizing the supply of clinicians who can supply those services. It harms health experts by avoiding them from providing services they are competent to offer and by avoiding capable people from getting in or rising within health professions.
By suspending such guidelines to improve access to take care of COVID-19 patients, states have actually acknowledged that licensing avoids clinicians from offering services they are competent to offer.
A much better option than direct government licensing is a system in which states recognize 3rd party organizations that accredit the competence of health experts. In such a system, certified educational institutions or certificate providing companies would define clinician classifications, determine scopes of practice for each classification, and license the training or abilities of individual clinicians.
Third party accreditation would enable innovative academic and certification programs, nontraditional career courses, incremental expansion of clinician abilities and scopes of practice, and the creation of brand-new categories of healthcare professionals. The result would be much better profession opportunities for clinicians and greater access to look after clients. In this online forum, experts will explore this and other reform ideas.
Join the discussion on Twitter utilizing #CatoHealth.
Follow #CatoCOVID for news and updates on the coronavirus pandemic from The Cato Institute.
https://allcnaprograms.com/right-skilling-health-professionals-replacing-federal-government-certifying-with-third-party-certification/
No comments:
Post a Comment